• Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact
  • Sign in
CloverDX Logo
Product
  • OVERVIEW
  • Discover CloverDX Data Integration Platform###Automate data pipelines, empower business users.
  • Deploy in Cloud
  • Deploy on Premise
  • Deploy on Docker
  • Plans & Pricing
  • Release Notes
  • Documentation
  • Customer Portal
  • More Resources
  • CAPABILITIES
  • Sources and Targets###Cloud and On-premise storage, Files, APIs, messages, legacy sources…
  • AI-enabled Transformations###Full code or no code, debugging, mapping
  • Automation & Orchestration###Full workflow management and robust operations
  • MDM & Data Stewardship###Reference data management
  • Manual Intervention###Manually review, edit and approve data
  • ROLES
  • Data Engineers###Automated Data Pipelines
  • Business Experts###Self-service & Collaboration
  • Data Stewards###MDM & Data Quality
clip-mini-card

 

Ask us anything!

We're here to walk you through how CloverDX can help you solve your data challenges.

 

Request a demo
Solutions
  • Solutions
  • On-Premise & Hybrid ETL###Flexible deployment & full control
  • Data Onboarding###Accelerate setup time for new data
  • Application Integration###Integrate operational data & systems
  • Replace Legacy Tooling###Modernize slow, unreliable or ad-hoc data processes
  • Self-Service Data Prep###Empower business users to do more
  • MDM & Data Stewardship###Give domain experts more power over data quality
  • Data Migration###Flexible, repeatable migrations - cloud, on-prem or hybrid
  • By Industry
  • SaaS
  • Healthcare & Insurance
  • FinTech
  • Government
  • Consultancy
zywave-3

How Zywave freed up engineer time by a third with automated data onboarding

Read case study
Services
  • Services
  • Onboarding & Training
  • Professional Services
  • Customer Support

More efficient, streamlined data feeds

Discover how Gain Theory automated their data ingestion and improved collaboration, productivity and time-to-delivery thanks to CloverDX.

 

Read case study
Customers
  • By Use Case
  • Analytics and BI
  • Data Ingest
  • Data Integration
  • Data Migration
  • Data Quality
  • Data Warehousing
  • Digital Transformation
  • By Industry
  • App & Platform Providers
  • Banking
  • Capital Markets
  • Consultancy & Advisory
  • E-Commerce
  • FinTech
  • Government
  • Healthcare
  • Logistics
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail
Migrating data to Workday - case study
Case study

Effectively Migrating Legacy Data Into Workday

Read customer story
Company
  • About CloverDX
  • Our Story & Leadership
  • Contact Us
  • Partners
  • CloverDX Partners
  • Become a Partner
Pricing
Demo
Trial

Building data pipelines to handle bad data: How to ensure data quality

Data Quality Data Ingest
Posted May 30, 2023
5 min read
Building data pipelines to handle bad data: How to ensure data quality

Ensuring data quality throughout your data pipelines can be challenging. In this blog post, we explore how to build data pipelines with bad data in mind, and how to build strategies to maintain data quality. 

By understanding the sources of bad data, implementing validation and profiling techniques, considering data quality at each pipeline step, and managing data errors effectively, you can mitigate the risks associated with poor data quality.

Understanding data quality

Data quality refers to the assessment of data to ensure its suitability for the intended purpose. Poor data quality, characterized by issues like accuracy, completeness, and consistency, can adversely affect the trustworthiness of the data your users are receiving, and result in bad business decisions.

It's crucial to prevent bad data from entering systems and propagating further, as repairing the damage caused by poor data can be costly and even harm the reputation of your whole organization.

Sources of bad data

Bad data can originate from a number of sources, including human errors during data entry, or software-related issues. For example, point-of-origin errors commonly occur when data is entered or recorded by individuals, leading to inaccuracies. Additionally, software-related factors such as data structure inconsistencies or format mismatches can contribute to bad data.

It's important to recognize these sources and be aware of how easily poor data can infiltrate systems.

Examples of bad data

To illustrate how easily poor data can enter systems, let's consider a few examples.

  • Date formats are a classic source of error, with discrepancies in formats causing confusion and misinterpretation.

Data pipelines for bad data - date format issues

String-based APIs, which often return data as strings, can introduce data quality issues if not handled correctly.

building pipelines for bad data - bad dates

  • User interfaces can also contribute to poor data quality, particularly when interfaces evolve while underlying data structures remain unchanged - for instance, a free text field being changed to a multiple choice dropdown - we end up with both types in our database and data users might not be aware of this variation, so aren't designing for it. 
  • Programmers themselves can inadvertently introduce data errors through simple mistakes like transposing data or inserting incorrect values.
  • Finally, case sensitivity can lead to duplicate files and data inconsistencies if not managed properly.

Mitigating bad data risks in data pipelines

Most quality issues arise when you put your data in motion – an integration, ingestion, or reshaping for use in a warehouse and so on. These data processes typically involve a data pipeline with multiple stages, each of which can allow errors to creep in. And they snowball – a seemingly small error can cause further errors throughout the pipeline and result in improper results for the end user.

Here's three things (plus one bonus thing) you can do to in your data pipelines to ensure better data quality:

1. Validation and profiling:

Incorporate explicit data quality checks in your pipeline, such as validation and profiling stages.

data pipelines - validation and profiling

When building your data pipeline, you should build in stages that explicitly deal with data quality - scrutinizing the data on the way in and the way out. Two key ways of doing this are data validation and data profiling:

  • Validation involves applying business rules to each record to ensure data meets specific criteria (such as: Does the ID field have right number of characters? Are the begin and end time stamps in the right order? Do I have a valid phone number in one of these 3 fields?) Records that pass the validation checks can proceed to the next step in the pipeline; those that don’t get pulled out for assessment and correction. 
  • Profiling involves creating statistical profiles of entire datasets to identify questionable data. These checks can be added at various pipeline stages, helping identify and filter out bad data effectively, and detecting when data quality might be beginning to decay.

2. Data quality in each pipeline step:

Recognize that poor data quality can emerge from any stage in the data pipeline.

Implement checks at each step to capture and address data quality issues as soon as possible, reducing the chances of propagating errors further downstream. Similar to unit testing in software development, treating each pipeline step as a testable component ensures early detection and resolution of data quality problems.

data pipelines for bad data - quality at each step

3. Data error management

Instead of merely capturing data errors, consider establishing a data error management process.

This process acts as a central hub for collecting rejected data from the pipeline, allowing for effective correction and reprocessing. It involves a combination of people, processes, and technology, and the data error manager should use a standard format for reporting errors.

data pipelines for bad data - error management

One important consideration is who has responsibility for fixing data errors. Even though IT staff might be the first to detect errors in the pipeline, they’re probably not the right people to correct it – they might not know the context of the data, or have the authority to fix it. Involving business users or domain experts ensures proper context and authority for making data corrections.

It's also important to standardize error reporting formats to streamline the resolution process. Error reports need to be presented in a way that a human can understand, and that gives them an actionable piece of intelligence they can act on to correct the data.

4. Data about your data

Implementing these stages into your pipelines to identify and handle bad data can not only improve your immediate data quality, but it can also give you a valuable opportunity to identify larger business issues such as flawed processes or training requirements (e.g. 'All of our West region POS devices are using the wrong timestamp') or uncover and reconcile differences in interpretations or definitions (e.g. 'Is the project closed because the Status field says Closed, or because the Close Date is in the past?). 

Good responses to bad data

Building data pipelines with bad data in mind and maintaining data quality is essential for organizations to derive meaningful insights and make informed decisions.

By understanding the sources of bad data, implementing validation and profiling techniques, considering data quality at each pipeline step, and effectively managing data errors, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with poor data quality. 

Having a standardized error handling process built into your pipelines can also give you valuable information about your business practices, enabling you to fix even more data quality issues at source.

Investing in robust data quality practices ensures that data remains trustworthy, reliable, and fit for its intended purpose throughout the pipeline.

Download a free trial of CloverDX and start building your own error handling rules.

This post is based on a webinar of the same title. You can watch the full video, presented by CloverDX Solutions Architect Kevin Scott, below:

 

New call-to-action

Share

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Email icon
Behind the Data  Learn how data leaders solve complex problems every day

Newsletter

Subscribe

Join 54,000+ data-minded IT professionals. Get regular updates from the CloverDX blog. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related articles

Back to all articles
Data ingestion from different sources on a whiteboard
Data Ingest
3 min read

How to say ‘yes’ to all types of data and embark on a data-driven transformation journey

Continue reading
Data ingestion tools - features you should look for
Data Ingest
7 min read

Data ingestion tools: 7 features you should look for

Continue reading
Data Quality
4 min read

Why data quality is crucial for data integration projects

Continue reading
CloverDX logo
Book a demo
Get the free trial
  • Company
  • Our Story
  • Contact
  • Partners
  • Our Partners
  • Become a Partner
  • Product
  • Platform Overview
  • Plans & Pricing
  • Customers
  • By Use Case
  • By Industry
  • Deployment
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • Services
  • Onboarding & Training
  • Professional Services
  • Customer Support
  • Resources
  • Customer Portal
  • Documentation
  • Downloads & Licenses
  • Webinars
  • Academy & Training
  • Release Notes
  • CloverDX Forum
  • CloverDX Blog
  • Behind the Data Podcast
  • Tech Blog
  • CloverDX Marketplace
  • Other resources
Blog
The vital importance of data governance in the age of AI
Data Governance
Bringing a human perspective to data integration, mapping and AI
Data Integration
How AI is shaping the future of data integration
Data Integration
How to say ‘yes’ to all types of data and embark on a data-driven transformation journey
Data Ingest
© 2025 CloverDX. All rights reserved.
  • info@cloverdx.com
  • sales@cloverdx.com
  • ●
  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • EULA
  • Support Policy